为了探究国产客机C919不同出口组合类型对撤离效率的影响，基于动态模拟舱的试验环境，开展人员应急撤离试验，对试验视频逐帧标记统计人员运动数据，以此为仿真模型提供数据支持。真人试验表明：在撤离过程中，C型门与Ⅲ型门平均人员通过与停留时间分别为1.97、6.86 s／人；人员在应急滑梯平均下滑时间为1.83s；在座椅区域，人员在内侧、中部、外侧的运动速度分别在0.20 ~ 0.64 m/s、0.16 ~ 1.00 m/s、0.19 ~ 2.71 m/s；在通道区域，人员的运动速度在1.076 ~ 3.625 m/s。利用AnyLogic搭建单通道客机全流程应急撤离模型，将人员运动数据输入仿真模型后分析不同出口组合下撤离效率分析，仿真实验结果表明：开启后舱门比开启应急舱门的撤离时间缩短24 s、开启前舱门比开启应急舱门的撤离时间缩短9 s；同时开启一侧中部舱门比开启左右两侧舱门时疏散时间缩短7 s。撤离时，人员存在惯性行为和就近选择出口行为。仿真模型通过信度效度验证提高了仿真精度，可为提高国产大飞机C919全流程应急撤离效率提供仿真工具。

To explore the impact of different exit combinations of C919 domestic airliners on evacuation efficiency, an emergency evacuation test was conducted based on the test environment of a dynamic simulation cabin. The movement data of personnel in the test video was marked and counted by frame to provide data support for the simulation model. It was shown by the real-person testing that the average passing and staying times for Type C and Type Ⅲ were 1.97 seconds per person and 6.86 seconds per person. The average sliding time on the emergency slide was measured to be 1.83 seconds. In the seating area, the movement speeds of individuals in the inner, middle and outer sections were found to 0.20 m/s to 0.64 m/s, 0.16 m/s to 1.00 m/s, and 0.19 m/s to 2.71 m/s. In the aisle area, the movement speed ranged between 1.076 m/s and 3.625 m/s. A full-process emergency evacuation model for single-aisle passenger aircraft was constructed using AnyLogic, and evacuation efficiency under different exit combinations was analyzed after inputting the human movement data into the simulation model. The simulation experiment results indicated that opening the rear hatch reduced evacuation time by 24 seconds compared to opening the emergency hatch, while opening the front hatch reduced evacuation time by 9 seconds compared to the emergency hatch. Additionally, opening a single middle door reduced evacuation time by 7 seconds compared to opening doors on both sides. During evacuation, inertia behavior and tendencies to choose the nearest exit were observed. The simulation model was validated for reliability and accuracy, providing a simulation tool to enhance the full-process emergency evacuation efficiency of C919 domestic large aircraft.