不同温度下的黑索今、奥克托今静电感度变化特性与规律
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TQ564;O441;

基金项目:


Study on the characteristics and regularity of RDX and HMX electrostatic sensitivity changes under different temperature conditions
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

undefined

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为掌握炸药生产过程中不同工艺温度条件下的静电危害风险程度,采用兰利-最优化D法数学物理模型,开展了黑索今(RDX)、奥克托今(HMX)两种典型硝胺类炸药在不同温度、不同响应概率下的静电感度试验研究,得到了对应的静电放电能量值。结果表明,在不同响应概率下,温度变化与RDX、HMX静电感度所对应的静电放电能量呈现明显的负相关特性,即随着温度升高,引爆其所需的静电放电能量对应降低。其中,50%响应概率时,RDX在30℃、60℃和90℃三种不同温度下所对应的静电放电能量值分别为102.07mJ、97.10mJ、64.14mJ,HMX所对应的静电放电能量值分别为248.13mJ、125.62mJ、84.24mJ。百万分之一(1ppm)响应概率时,RDX在不同温度下对应的静电放电能量值分别为4.26mJ、2.84mJ、0.89mJ,HMX所对应的静电放电能量值分别为2.38mJ、2.09mJ、0.10mJ。对比发现,RDX的静电感度在50%响应概率下所对应的静电放电能量明显低于同条件下HMX的相关数值,但在1%、0.01% 、1ppm三种响应概率下,HMX所对应的静电放电能量却低于RDX的相关数值。可见RDX、HMX两种炸药在不同温度和响应概率下的静电感度有明显差异,在生产过程中评估这两种炸药的安全风险时,应高度关注静电特性的变化。

    Abstract:

    In order to grasp the risk degree of electrostatic hazard under different process temperature conditions in the production process of explosives, using the Langley-Optimized D method mathematical and physical model, experimental research was carried out on the electrostatic sensitivity of two typical nitramine explosives, Hexogen (RDX) and Octogen (HMX), at different temperatures and response probabilities, and the corresponding electrostatic discharge energy values were obtained. The results show that under different response probabilities, the electrostatic discharge energy of RDX and HMX is negatively correlated with temperature change, that is, with the increase of temperature, the electrostatic discharge energy required for detonation decreases. Among them, at 50% response probability, the corresponding electrostatic discharge energy values of RDX at three different temperatures of 30℃, 60℃ and 90℃ are 102.07mJ, 97.10mJ and 64.14mJ, respectively, and the corresponding electrostatic discharge energy values of HMX are 248.13mJ, 125.62mJ and 84.24mJ, respectively. At the 1 parts per million (1ppm) response probability, the corresponding electrostatic discharge energy values of RDX at different temperatures are 4.26mJ, 2.84mJ, and 0.89mJ, respectively, and the corresponding electrostatic discharge energy values of HMX are 2.38mJ, 2.09mJ, and 0.10mJ, respectively. It is found that the electrostatic discharge energy corresponding to the electrostatic sensitive of RDX is significantly lower than the correlation value of HMX under the same condition at a response probability of 50%, but the electrostatic discharge energy corresponding to HMX is lower than the correlation value of RDX at the three response probabilities of 1%, 0.01% and 1ppm. There are significant differences in the electrostatic sensitivity of RDX and HMX explosives at different temperatures and response probabilities, the change in electrostatic characteristics should be highly concerned in assessing the safety risks of these two explosives during production.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙铭泽,王艳平,曾丹,等. 不同温度下的黑索今、奥克托今静电感度变化特性与规律[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2026, 26(13): 5628-5636.
Sun Mingze, Wang Yanping, Zeng Dan, et al. Study on the characteristics and regularity of RDX and HMX electrostatic sensitivity changes under different temperature conditions[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2026,26(13):5628-5636.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-30
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-20
  • 录用日期:2026-01-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-18
  • 出版日期:
×
2026年会通知 | “技术经济学驱动智能经济生态构建与治理变革”——中国技术经济学会第三十三届学术年会(2026)会议通知暨征文启事(第一轮)
亟待确认版面费归属稿件,敬请作者关注