初次全膝关节置换术加速康复: 倒刺线缝合关节囊的应用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 459 .9;R318;R687

基金项目:


The clinical research of capsular closure with barbed suture in primary total knee arthroplasty under enhanced recovery after surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价在加速康复理念下初次全膝关节置换术中应用倒刺线缝合关节囊较可吸收线的优势 方法 回顾性分析2018年7月至2019年7月本科行初次全膝关节置换术的85例患者,其中倒刺线组41例、可吸收线组44例,比较两组在切口缝合时间、切口并发症、术后关节功能方面的差异。结果 倒刺线组关节囊缝合时间(1.66±0.037min)、总缝合时间(6.57±0.081min)与可吸收线组(2.63±0.058min、6.57±0.081min)相比显著缩短,差异有统计学意义(P=0.003、P=0.035);倒刺线组皮下缝合时间(3.65±0.028min)、皮肤缝合时间(0.28±0.026min)与可吸收线组相比(3.67±0.043min、0.28±0.026min),差异无统计学意义(P=0.100、P=0.740);倒刺线组切口皮下血肿率(0%)低于可吸收线组(2.4%),倒刺线组切口并发症发生率(2.4%)低于可吸收线组(4.8%),差异无统计学意义(P=1.0);倒刺线组术后膝关节活动度与可吸收线组相比(125.73±2.37°vs. 126.02±2.36°),差异无统计学意义(P=0.961);术后3月和末次随访两组KSS(Knee Society Clinical Rating System)临床评分及功能评分均较术前明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组组间及组内比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 倒刺线缝合关节囊手术时间短,切口并发症少,术后关节功能良好,有利于加速康复,推荐使用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the advantage of barbed suture to traditional suture technique in capsular closure of primary total knee arthroplasty under enhanced recovery after surgery. Methods A total number of 85 patients for primary total knee arthroplasty in our department form July 2018 to July 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into two groups: barbed suture group(n=41) and absorbable suture group(n=44). The closure time of the incision, post-operative complications of the incison and post-operative function of the knee of the two groups were compared to evaluate the differences of the clinical results. Results The capsular closure time and global closure time of the barbed suture group(1.66±0.037min、6.57±0.081min) was significantly shorter than that of the absorbable suture group(2.63±0.058min、6.57±0.081min), indicating significantly statistical differences(P=0.003、P=0.035); the subcutaneous and skin closure time of the barbed suture group(3.65±0.028min,0.28±0.026min) compared with the absorbable suture group(3.67±0.043min、0.28±0.026min) were no significantly statistical differences(P=0.100、P=0.740).The rate of incision subdermal hematoma(0%)of the barbed suture group was lower than that of absorbable suture group(2.4%),The incidence rate of complications of incision of the barbed suture group(2.4%)was lower than that of the absorbable suture group(4.8%) which has no significantly statistical differences(P=1.0).The post-operative range of motion of the knee of the barbed suture group was no significantly statistical differences with the absorbable suture group(125.73±2.37°vs 126.02±2.36°, P=0.961).The KSS clinical score and function score at three months after surgery and the last follow-up were significantly improved before surgery respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);There was no statistically significant differences between the two groups and inside the two groups(P>0.05) Conclusion Barbed suture is associated with shorter closure time in capsular closure, less post-operative complications of incision and excellent post-operative function of the knee which contributed to enhanced recovery after surgery and should be recommended in the future.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

袁宇飞,张存,李冠军,等. 初次全膝关节置换术加速康复: 倒刺线缝合关节囊的应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(18): 7500-7504.
Yuan Yufei, Zhang Cun, Li Guanjun, et al. The clinical research of capsular closure with barbed suture in primary total knee arthroplasty under enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(18):7500-7504.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-08
  • 最后修改日期:2021-05-30
  • 录用日期:2021-03-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-07-29
  • 出版日期:
×
律回春渐,新元肇启|《科学技术与工程》编辑部恭祝新岁!
亟待确认版面费归属稿件,敬请作者关注